Moving the funnel forward


Spoiler alert:

This email is all about a better way to build trust and front-load your funnel with the right audience for better ads.

My good mate Adriana has a cool, free Audience Accelerator guide to help you build a better audience.

You can grab it by clicking below.

Image for Strategic AF

Strategic AF

by Adriana Tica

Tired of marketing advice that’s either obvious or outright shady? Strategic AF flips the script. It's the only newsletter that treats solopreneurs, founders, and marketers like grown-ups, not toddlers looking for the next shiny toy. Subscribe to get sharp, no-nonsense strategy advice without the cringe. No bro-marketing, no fluff — just real, sustainable growth tactics. Subscribe if you want results. Scroll past if you prefer gimmicks.

Now, onto today's email


In the last month, I’ve:

  • Bought 2 courses on YouTube ads
  • Watched hours of content
  • Spent entire days DM’ing specialist YT media buyers

And here’s what I found:

Most serious YouTube advertisers follow a very different playbook than the typical Meta strategy.

On Meta, users are just scrolling — if your hook’s decent and the offer’s cheap, they’ll take a punt.

But YouTube is different.

People aren’t killing time — they’re searching for answers.

Intent is higher... but so are expectations.

Especially around trust.

I tried the same old formula:

Cold traffic → Low-ticket offer.

It bombed.

Turns out, people on YT don’t just “try things.” They need more belief first.

The solution?

Push your funnel into the ad strategy itself:

  • One ad to call out your ICP
  • Another to introduce your solution
  • Another to build proof and trust

you'vegot to build multipl ads and have a solid retargeting startegy to make sure the right people see the right message at the right time.

It’s a slower burn. More touchpoints. And so, more spend on the ads.

But (at least for me) YouTube’s CPC is about ~80% cheaper than Meta, so it balances out.

I'm still figuring it out (and losing some money along the way), but I’m documenting all of it inside GM+.

If you wanna skip the expensive learning curve and see what actually works, join us.

Check out GM+ here.

Pete "losing money on YT" Boyle

Vagrants, Vagabonds, and Villains Ltd, Unit 16535, 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, Dorset BH16 6FA
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Growth Models

I've spent ~10 years helping digital brands grow. I share what I know and what I'm experimenting with in this newsletter.

Read more from Growth Models

Yesterday I mentioned "The Thread." That invisible line connecting your first ad or cold outreach to the moment a client signs a contract for the big thing. And when you're getting fewer sales for the "big thing", most founders think the solution is to simply add "more." More leads. More SDRs. More ad spend. But if your "Thread" is broken, "More" is just an expensive way to realise your system is leaking. I mean, if you've got a bucket with no bottom, throwing more water in the top isn't...

I’m starting the outreach for a new business venture today. Most people at this stage do the 'tactical' thing... They buy a list Hire a virtual assistant to spam LinkedIn asking for a call or promoting the offer And hope for a 1% reply rate. A huge waste of capital and time. With the new venture, I've spent the last week building out the architecture behind the offer. I’ve been mapping the 'Thread' that connects the first touchpoint to the final contract. Most businesses, even those doing...

I’m curious... What AI are you actually using? Or are you just "collecting" subscriptions? We’ve been debating this in GM+ lately because, frankly, the shine has worn off OpenAI for me. To give you some context, I’ve been an OpenAI power user since the start. But the 5.2 release? It’s woeful. I spend more time arguing with the "Custom GPTs" than I do getting actual work done. I guess they told it to stop being so sycophantic, now it's like a petulant little kid who doesn't like when you tell...