Price elasticity


Was recently chatting to someone about the pricing stages for their $1 Product Funnel.

We were figuring out whether their upsell price was too big of a jump from their initial front-end purchase.

So, I started combing back through offers I’ve run successfully, and what I see a lot of other people do to see if there are any benchmarks or potential guidelines.

Personally, I’ve always tried to keep the upsell pricing to be between 10 - 30X the pricing of the front-end offer.

So if you’re front-end offer is $10, the upsell could be between $100 and $300.

This, to me, is a good baseline from which to work.

However, in another community I’m in I’ve seen people talk about there being a 100X multiple potential.

Personally, I think that is a stretch for a lot of people unless you’re leading with a $1 offer (e.g $1 to $100 is doable)

Often, that kind of a jump breaks the yes ladder for pricing.

Of course these are guidelines.

I saw a post from one guy who was selling a $7 front-end product and had a $3000 upsell from it which had sold.

I’m dubious that he’s doing that every day, but still, an impressive leap.

The baseline rules are there as a guide.

The key thing is to look at the wider economics of the model you’re building.

A $1 - $100 might have a higher conversion rate than a $1 - $1000.

But, which one drives the highest overall revenue? The latter is worth 10 of the former in the above.

Often, ramping up the cost lowers the CVR but massively increases overall cash taken.

Yes, your CAC will go up, but so too will your revenue.

It’s about finding that balance that makes it sustainable.

There is no one way to work these things.

Even the initial $1 product pricing is elastic. It’s meant to be a “no-brainer” for the audience.

That no-brainer fee will be different for a B2C offer targeting low-income households vs a B2B offer targeting multi-billion dollar companies.

You have to test all of these things and find the right balance between the # of leads you’re bringing in, the CVR, and the cash you take home at the end of the day.

If this all sounds like jargon but you're interested in setting up your own $1 Product Funnel, check out the $1 Product Challenge here.

Pete "$1 Products" Boyle

Vagrants, Vagabonds, and Villains Ltd, Unit 16535, 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, Dorset BH16 6FA
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Growth Models

I've spent ~10 years helping digital brands grow. I share what I know and what I'm experimenting with in this newsletter.

Read more from Growth Models

Yesterday I mentioned "The Thread." That invisible line connecting your first ad or cold outreach to the moment a client signs a contract for the big thing. And when you're getting fewer sales for the "big thing", most founders think the solution is to simply add "more." More leads. More SDRs. More ad spend. But if your "Thread" is broken, "More" is just an expensive way to realise your system is leaking. I mean, if you've got a bucket with no bottom, throwing more water in the top isn't...

I’m starting the outreach for a new business venture today. Most people at this stage do the 'tactical' thing... They buy a list Hire a virtual assistant to spam LinkedIn asking for a call or promoting the offer And hope for a 1% reply rate. A huge waste of capital and time. With the new venture, I've spent the last week building out the architecture behind the offer. I’ve been mapping the 'Thread' that connects the first touchpoint to the final contract. Most businesses, even those doing...

I’m curious... What AI are you actually using? Or are you just "collecting" subscriptions? We’ve been debating this in GM+ lately because, frankly, the shine has worn off OpenAI for me. To give you some context, I’ve been an OpenAI power user since the start. But the 5.2 release? It’s woeful. I spend more time arguing with the "Custom GPTs" than I do getting actual work done. I guess they told it to stop being so sycophantic, now it's like a petulant little kid who doesn't like when you tell...