Price elasticity


Was recently chatting to someone about the pricing stages for their $1 Product Funnel.

We were figuring out whether their upsell price was too big of a jump from their initial front-end purchase.

So, I started combing back through offers I’ve run successfully, and what I see a lot of other people do to see if there are any benchmarks or potential guidelines.

Personally, I’ve always tried to keep the upsell pricing to be between 10 - 30X the pricing of the front-end offer.

So if you’re front-end offer is $10, the upsell could be between $100 and $300.

This, to me, is a good baseline from which to work.

However, in another community I’m in I’ve seen people talk about there being a 100X multiple potential.

Personally, I think that is a stretch for a lot of people unless you’re leading with a $1 offer (e.g $1 to $100 is doable)

Often, that kind of a jump breaks the yes ladder for pricing.

Of course these are guidelines.

I saw a post from one guy who was selling a $7 front-end product and had a $3000 upsell from it which had sold.

I’m dubious that he’s doing that every day, but still, an impressive leap.

The baseline rules are there as a guide.

The key thing is to look at the wider economics of the model you’re building.

A $1 - $100 might have a higher conversion rate than a $1 - $1000.

But, which one drives the highest overall revenue? The latter is worth 10 of the former in the above.

Often, ramping up the cost lowers the CVR but massively increases overall cash taken.

Yes, your CAC will go up, but so too will your revenue.

It’s about finding that balance that makes it sustainable.

There is no one way to work these things.

Even the initial $1 product pricing is elastic. It’s meant to be a “no-brainer” for the audience.

That no-brainer fee will be different for a B2C offer targeting low-income households vs a B2B offer targeting multi-billion dollar companies.

You have to test all of these things and find the right balance between the # of leads you’re bringing in, the CVR, and the cash you take home at the end of the day.

If this all sounds like jargon but you're interested in setting up your own $1 Product Funnel, check out the $1 Product Challenge here.

Pete "$1 Products" Boyle

Vagrants, Vagabonds, and Villains Ltd, Unit 16535, 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, Dorset BH16 6FA
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Growth Models

I've spent ~10 years helping digital brands grow. I share what I know and what I'm experimenting with in this newsletter.

Read more from Growth Models

Picture this... You've identified the problem in your business. Where things break down and money is being lost. You analyse, design the fix, and set everyone on the path to implementing that fix. Time to pop the champaign right? Nope. After you've built that awesome fix, you see... nothing. No improvements, no meaningful changes, no new sales. And you're back to square one. It's a problem I see a lot. People fixing the symptom, but completely missing the cause. here's what I mean. I worked...

If we were to sit down and go through all the things I've done right in my career, and then all the things I've done wrong... ... the time split would be like a 10/90 split. I've failed so much more than succeeded over the years. They're good teaching moments. But, one of the more dangerous things in business isn’t choosing the wrong tactic. It’s committing to it. Once you’ve got buy-in from yourself or your team, you want it to work. So you keep pushing it longer than you should. Case in...

A big name marketer shared the results of a study he did last week on how brands are marketing in 2026. Long story short, most of them are... Cutting ad spend Cutting content/online PR Removing agencies ... all because the lead quality is trash. It went on to explain how people are moving back to in-person marketing and the established methods are dying off. Which ain't exactly true. Look, brands are cutting spend. And yeah, I agree that in-person stuff - or at least non AI stuff - is gonna...