Fees for the sake of it...


I'm gonna kick this off by saying that I think Hormozi has shown himself to be a great marketer...

... but recently, some of his advice feels too much like cheap money grabs.

I read something the other day around his advice on how to "maximise LTV for recurring fee customers".

The advice is completely trash IMO and will do nothing more than ruin your rep.

His advice was to add an annual renewal fee onto people's recurring fees.

Let's say you run a community like GM+ and your monthly fee is $50.

Hormozi's advice is to then also add a renewal fee onto that subscription every year.

So, on a $50 / month subscription, you might have a renewal fee of $150, taking the potential yearly value of that customer from $600 to $750.

The question I have is...

Why?

You're not offering any more value for that fee. You're just charging people because you can.

And I reckon you'll lose more people than you get to pay this fee.

Look, I'm all for increasing LTV.

I don't hide the fact that we're all running businesses; revenue and profit are top of mind for us all and that's OK.

But this is not the way to increase LTV.

What is the better way?

Here's something I recently helped a coaching client implement to increase LTV of their recurring fee.

(FYI - you can still apply to get 1:1 Coaching with me through this form - got a spot left).

Let's imagine for easy maths that your monthly fee is $100.

And let's also imagine on average, the lifetime of a customer is 8 months.

So, the LTV of that customer on that product is $800.

Here's the thing.

That's the average.

Some people will stay longer than 8 months, but a lot will not stay that long.

So, when someone joins your monthly fee offer, you send them a sales equence that mentions they can upgrade to a yearly membership instead.

The price of the yearly membership?

$800 to bring it in line with your average lifetime value.

The user is getting a heavy discount for signing up for a year.

You're getting someone at the better lifetime value for your offer (this usually increases overall revenue and profit for you).

It's a win-win.

And add another win as yearly churn rate is often much lower than monthly.

What it all comes down to is cash collected today is better than potential cash tomorrow.

This is an ethical way of collecting more cash without exploiting people with crappy "add-on" charges.

In this instance, everybody wins.

Pete "don't be a scumbag" Boyle

P.S - Here's that link for 1:1 coaching again.

P.S.

Want a little more direct help from me? Here's a few ways I could help out.

Vagrants, Vagabonds, and Villains Ltd, Unit 16535, 13 Freeland Park, Wareham Road, Poole, Dorset BH16 6FA
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Growth Models

I've spent ~10 years helping digital brands grow. I share what I know and what I'm experimenting with in this newsletter.

Read more from Growth Models

Couple of days back I was on a consult with a GM+ member. They've just finished building some new offers, but wanted help in structuring the acquisition side of the equation. In 20 minutes, I mapped out a full $1 product funnel that: Had a potential order value of over $300 Reused 80% of assets they already had Needed maybe 1 hour of work to finish Will pre-sell these same users on their primary offer They're off working to et the thing live right now. And once they've got it up and running,...

Yo! I'm fast running out of time today so this is gonna be a super quick email. In GM+, we were analysing some AI-based front-end offers we've seen in the wild that are are selling for $7-$97. Simple stuff at their core. People create a custom AI agent that handles a painful problem for the target market. Sell access to it and the user gets the outcome in under 5 mins of effort. To better understand it, I've built my own and amd building a new funnel around it. I'll be launching ads for this...

Most people don’t have a strategy. They just copy what looks cool. ... Nice ad? Copy it.... Decent headline? Swipe it.... Pretty funnel? Clone it. But without knowing why it works... or even if it works, you’re just guessing on a faster timeline. The smart move? Look at what’s performing, then break it down. Who’s the ad really targeting? What problem is it addressing? Where does it sit in the funnel? What’s the angle behind the copy? If you get that right, you’re not just collecting tactics....